Abril fires journalists and closes

shafi321@gmail.

This happens even though newspapers and magazines are becoming thinner, with less advertising and cutting jobs. Let's see reactions from exponents that support the conclusion of the end of the model, showing the stages of grief in the messages. I remember the stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. I'm not even going to take a current example, like soap operas ridiculing bloggers or influencers. I will use old examples of denial and anger to show that the fight is not new. Read the original article by clicking on the link below, from which I only remove the most symptomatic paragraphs and highlight the main one. See the call. In “profound transformation”,  magazines Exame PME and Capricho Denial The article is written from the point of view of journalists and their union, but


cites the Abril statement, which speaks of boldness as a justification Wuhan Mobile Number List for the dismissal of professionals, a situation it calls a movement. At no point do you read about the layoffs. Read: “Without talking about layoffs or detailing what actually led to the end of three publications, the president of Editora Abril, Alexandre Cialdini, speaks of boldness on the part of the company: “This move is very bold and remarkable for the future of Abril in this fascinating world of media, which never stops transforming, as from now on, Abril is constantly evolving in its product offering, in its way of act and think. This is what our customers and audiences demand. And that’s what – with bold, restless and very capable people – we are doing.” I know this is a text created by so-called crisis managers, but if this is not a symptom of denial, what is? Anger In this case, in the





same text, the indignation comes from the São Paulo Journalists Union (SJSP), which only analyzes the situation from the journalists' point of view, under the sad aspect of the dismissals, without being willing to analyze the causes and, mainly, without proposing possible alternatives. This is what is expected of a union, after all, defending professionals is its only purpose, but opening discussions on alternatives and seeking solutions should also be the case. Look: “Journalists cannot passively watch this situation.